International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021
Pharmacokinetic comparison between tablet of varenicline tartrate and orally disintegrating film of varenicline salicylate in healthy subjects.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim Eunwoo, Hwang Jun Gi, Park Su Jun, Han Ji Young, Choi Young-Sim, Park Se-Rin, Yu Kyung-Sang, Park Min Kyu, Lee SeungHwan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Varenicline is an efficacious aid for smoking cessation. In this study, the pharmacokinetics and safety were compared between film-coated tablets of varenicline tartrate (reference drug) and the newly developed orally disintegrating films of varenicline salicylate (test drug), both of them contained 1 mg of varenicline.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-sequence, two-period crossover study was conducted in healthy male subjects. Serial blood samples were obtained for up to 72 hours in each period, with a washout period of 7 days or more. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the noncompartmental method. Safety profiles were assessed throughout the study.
RESULTS: A total of 28 subjects completed the study. The plasma varenicline concentration-time profiles were similar for the two study drugs. The maximum plasma varenicline concentration (Cmax) was 5,768.95 ng/L (mean) and 5,780.55 ng/L for the test drug and reference drug, respectively. The areas under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable time point (AUC0-t) were 94,086.30 h×ng/L and 89,958.55 h×ng/L for the test drug and reference drug, respectively. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the test drug to the reference drug for Cmax and AUC0-t were 0.9955 (0.9488 - 1.0444) and 1.0449 (0.9848 - 1.1088), respectively, which fell within the bioequivalence range of 0.8 - 1.25. There was no difference in safety between the study drugs.
CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics and safety profiles were similar between the two study drugs. The orally disintegrating film of varenicline salicylate can be an alternative to varenicline tartrate tablets.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-sequence, two-period crossover study was conducted in healthy male subjects. Serial blood samples were obtained for up to 72 hours in each period, with a washout period of 7 days or more. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the noncompartmental method. Safety profiles were assessed throughout the study.
RESULTS: A total of 28 subjects completed the study. The plasma varenicline concentration-time profiles were similar for the two study drugs. The maximum plasma varenicline concentration (Cmax) was 5,768.95 ng/L (mean) and 5,780.55 ng/L for the test drug and reference drug, respectively. The areas under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable time point (AUC0-t) were 94,086.30 h×ng/L and 89,958.55 h×ng/L for the test drug and reference drug, respectively. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the test drug to the reference drug for Cmax and AUC0-t were 0.9955 (0.9488 - 1.0444) and 1.0449 (0.9848 - 1.1088), respectively, which fell within the bioequivalence range of 0.8 - 1.25. There was no difference in safety between the study drugs.
CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics and safety profiles were similar between the two study drugs. The orally disintegrating film of varenicline salicylate can be an alternative to varenicline tartrate tablets.