Comparison of single versus double TightRope system in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of the coracoclavicular (CC) ligament using a single TightRope (ST) system has some complications. We attempted to use a double TightRope (DT) system to reduce complications and obtain the ideal therapeutic effect.

PURPOSE: This investigation aimed to compare the ST and DT systems in terms of efficacy and safety in treating acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation.

METHODS

Sixty-six cases of acute AC joint dislocation between January 2013 and January 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were divided into 2 groups based on treatment with the ST or DT system. Patients were evaluated radiologically and clinically using the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Constant, and visual analog scale scores as clinical outcome measures at 1 day, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. The CC distance and displacement ratio were assessed radiologically.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 49 months. Satisfactory clinical outcomes were obtained after CC fixation in both groups. No intergroup difference was found regarding the visual analog scale (P = .80), Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (P = .42), or Constant score (P = .28) at 2 years. However, there was a significant difference in the displacement ratio at 6 weeks (P < .0001), 3 months (P < .0001), 6 months (P < .0001), 1 year (P < .0001), and 2 years (P < .0001) postoperatively between the 2 groups. There were 3 complications in the ST group, including 1 case of secondary coracoid fracture, 1 case of AC joint arthrosis combined with ossification of the CC ligaments, and 1 case of clavicular erosion. All complications occurred in the ST group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both surgical methods are effective in treating AC joint dislocation, but the DT system is more reliable for reduction maintenance.