MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.10.035

Медицинская библиотека · Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2009

Endoscopic stapling of pharyngeal pouch: a 10-year review of single versus multiple staple rows.

Roth Jason A, Sigston Elizabeth, Vallance Neil

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes obtained in patients undergoing endoscopic stapling of pharyngeal pouches with single versus multiple rows of staples.

STUDY

DESIGN

A retrospective, 10-year review.

SUBJECTS AND

METHODS

Review of medical records in 38 patients who underwent endoscopic pharyngeal pouch repair.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent stapling with multiple rows had a higher postoperative leak rate than patients who were stapled with a single row (36% vs 0%, P < 0.05). Patients with multiple rows also had a more prolonged length of stay and a slower return to both clear fluids and solid diet (P < 0.05). There was no difference in recurrence rate or patient satisfaction between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The technique of endoscopic pharyngeal pouch stapling has the potential to achieve excellent results. The application of more than one row of staples may be necessary to divide the common wall. However, in our series this is associated with a significantly increased risk of esophageal or pouch perforation. Care should be taken during the placement of multiple rows of staples.

Для цитирования: Roth Jason A, Sigston Elizabeth, Vallance Neil. Endoscopic stapling of pharyngeal pouch: a 10-year review of single versus multiple staple rows.. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.10.035.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.