Head & face medicine · 2025
Interobserver reliability in the 3D facial scan assessment of the outcome in dermal filler therapy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vadasz Anna, Vlocsko Mate, Tarjanyi Tamas, Rarosi Ferenc, Vereb Tamas, Zicsi-Liess Anna Lili, Hegedus Laszlo, Jancsik Veronika Agnes, Piffko Jozsef
Аннотация
STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a prospective cohort study comparing interobserver reliability of 2 different 3D scanning measurement methods following dermal filler therapy in oral cleft patients.
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: The objective of the study was to compare the interobserver reliability of 2 different assessment methods of 3D facial scan data.
METHODS: We studied 10 oral-cleft patients prospectively who underwent dermal filler therapy in the oral region by a single oral-surgeon using a modified injecting technique with 27 gauge 25 mm micro-cannula between 2021 and 2023. 3D facial scans were made before the treatment procedure and during follow-up visits and were used for analysis. The interbody fusion was scored on these 3D images using the 2 classification systems (Method 1, Method 2) by 3 experienced orthodontic specialists all of whom were blinded to clinical data and outcome.
RESULTS: Of the 2 classifications included in the current study, all classifications had a high interobserver agreement.
CONCLUSION: The 2 assessment methods used in this study showed high interobserver reliability so we can conclude that, the applied methods may provide as a validation in the outcome of dermal filler therapy. However, we suggest that further refinements may be required to achieve a reliable and consistent assessment of 3D facial scan analysis after dermal filler therapy in oral cleft patients.
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: The objective of the study was to compare the interobserver reliability of 2 different assessment methods of 3D facial scan data.
METHODS: We studied 10 oral-cleft patients prospectively who underwent dermal filler therapy in the oral region by a single oral-surgeon using a modified injecting technique with 27 gauge 25 mm micro-cannula between 2021 and 2023. 3D facial scans were made before the treatment procedure and during follow-up visits and were used for analysis. The interbody fusion was scored on these 3D images using the 2 classification systems (Method 1, Method 2) by 3 experienced orthodontic specialists all of whom were blinded to clinical data and outcome.
RESULTS: Of the 2 classifications included in the current study, all classifications had a high interobserver agreement.
CONCLUSION: The 2 assessment methods used in this study showed high interobserver reliability so we can conclude that, the applied methods may provide as a validation in the outcome of dermal filler therapy. However, we suggest that further refinements may be required to achieve a reliable and consistent assessment of 3D facial scan analysis after dermal filler therapy in oral cleft patients.