MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/icu.0000000000000184

Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2015

Complications and outcomes after autoenucleation.

Gauger Elizabeth H, Sobel Rachel K, Allen Richard C

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Autoenucleation has long been described in the literature, dating back as far as the 4th century AD. Within a 3-month period, two patients were admitted to our hospital after autoenucleation. A comprehensive review of the literature was performed to identify trends in, risk factors for, and potential life-threatening complications of autoenucleation.

RECENT FINDINGS: Two adult Caucasian men were transferred from outside hospitals after autoenucleation. One patient's urine tested positive for methamphetamines, and the second patient had a history of schizophrenia. In both cases, imaging of the head and orbits was performed to rule out secondary sequelae after self-enucleation. Patient one did not have any intracranial abnormalities. Patient 2 had a head computed tomography scan that showed a left internal carotid artery dissection, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and basal ganglia/thalamic stroke. Review of the literature revealed that almost all cases were associated with underlying mental illness and/or a history of drug abuse.

SUMMARY: Autoenucleation occurs more frequently in patients with psychiatric illness or drug abuse. It can be a devastating injury, not only locally, but neurologically. Ophthalmologists should be aware of the potentially life-threatening consequences of autoenucleation.

Для цитирования: Gauger Elizabeth H, Sobel Rachel K, Allen Richard C. Complications and outcomes after autoenucleation.. Current opinion in ophthalmology. 2015. DOI: 10.1097/icu.0000000000000184.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.