Cancer risk in adults with pathogenic germline variants in RAS/MAPK genes using genomic ascertainment.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Genomic ascertainment of electronic health record-linked exome data was used to quantify germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant prevalence, cancer prevalence, and survival in adults with non-NF1 RAS/mitogen-activated protein kinase genes (RASopathies).
METHODS
Germline RASopathy variants were examined from adult participants in UK Biobank (UKBB; n = 469,802), Geisinger MyCode (n = 167,050), and Mount Sinai BioMe (n = 30,470). Variants were classified as per American College of Medical Genetics/Association for Molecular Pathology criteria and reviewed by a RASopathy variant expert. Heterozygotes harbored a RASopathy pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant; non-heterozygotes harbored wild type or benign/likely benign RASopathy variation. To distinguish germline variants from clonal hematopoiesis, benign tissues were Sanger sequenced. Phenotype data were extracted.
RESULTS
Noonan syndrome-associated genes heterozygotes (excluding known Noonan syndrome with multiple lentigines variants) were most common with an estimated prevalence ranging between 1:1772 to 1:3330 in the cohorts. In SPRED1 (HGNC:20249) heterozygotes, cancer prevalence was only significantly increased in UKBB (OR: 3.8 [95% CI: 2.48-8.64]; P = 1.2 × 10-3). In MyCode and UKBB cohorts, no sufficient evidence of increased cancer risk was found in Noonan-, CBL- (HGNC:1541) and cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome heterozygotes.
CONCLUSION
In some RASopathies, adult cancer risk may not be elevated. These findings merit replication. There may be an increased cancer risk for adult SPRED1 heterozygotes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.