Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
Based on the health belief model: a qualitative exploration of factors influencing early screening behavior for breast cancer-related lymphedema.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sun Jinting, Chen Yuanfei, Xu Juan, Jiang Ying, Ji Juan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study explored postoperative breast cancer patients' experiences, perceptions, and barriers associated with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) screening.
METHODS: A qualitative descriptive design was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 postoperative breast cancer patients recruited from a tertiary hospital in Suzhou, China, using purposive sampling with maximum variation. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis following the six-phase procedure outlined by Braun and Clarke. Reporting followed the COREQ guidelines.
RESULTS: Four themes were identified: (1) limited understanding and misinterpretation of BCRL risk; (2) motivations and barriers to screening behavior; (3) social and systemic constraints on screening; and (4) self-efficacy and health responsibility. Participants commonly lacked knowledge of BCRL, underestimated their risk, and had limited awareness of its long-term consequences. Screening participation was shaped by perceived benefits, logistical barriers, skepticism regarding effectiveness, and broader social and healthcare system constraints. Self-efficacy and an internalized sense of health responsibility promoted screening despite existing barriers.
CONCLUSION: BCRL screening behavior reflects an interaction between cognitive appraisal, contextual constraints, and health system factors. Interventions should focus on strengthening survivorship follow-up, clinician communication, and access to screening services.
METHODS: A qualitative descriptive design was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 postoperative breast cancer patients recruited from a tertiary hospital in Suzhou, China, using purposive sampling with maximum variation. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis following the six-phase procedure outlined by Braun and Clarke. Reporting followed the COREQ guidelines.
RESULTS: Four themes were identified: (1) limited understanding and misinterpretation of BCRL risk; (2) motivations and barriers to screening behavior; (3) social and systemic constraints on screening; and (4) self-efficacy and health responsibility. Participants commonly lacked knowledge of BCRL, underestimated their risk, and had limited awareness of its long-term consequences. Screening participation was shaped by perceived benefits, logistical barriers, skepticism regarding effectiveness, and broader social and healthcare system constraints. Self-efficacy and an internalized sense of health responsibility promoted screening despite existing barriers.
CONCLUSION: BCRL screening behavior reflects an interaction between cognitive appraisal, contextual constraints, and health system factors. Interventions should focus on strengthening survivorship follow-up, clinician communication, and access to screening services.