MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0022215113001102

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2013

Nerve-sparing subcapsular resection of head and neck schwannomas: technique evaluation and literature review.

Battoo A J, Sheikh Z A, Thankappan K, Hicks W, Iyer S, Kuriakose M A

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The head and neck region harbours crucial structures and hence the surgical technique used to remove schwannomas from this region should cause minimal damage to these structures, with complete removal of pathology.

METHODS

This study entailed a retrospective analysis of 10 patients with head and neck schwannomas that were excised using a nerve-sparing subcapsular dissection technique. The primary aims were to assess the functional impact of the surgical technique on the structure of origin and to evaluate local control.

RESULTS

One patient with parapharyngeal schwannoma developed symptoms suggestive of 'first bite syndrome' in the late post-operative period. Another patient with facial nerve schwannoma had House-Brackmann grade II weakness in the immediate post-operative period, which subsequently resolved. None of the patients developed recurrence during a median follow-up period of two years.

CONCLUSION

The nerve-sparing subcapsular dissection technique provided effective local control of tumour pathology, with relative preservation of neural function post-operatively.

Для цитирования: Battoo A J, Sheikh Z A, Thankappan K, Hicks W, Iyer S, Kuriakose M A. Nerve-sparing subcapsular resection of head and neck schwannomas: technique evaluation and literature review.. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2013. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215113001102.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.