MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s41598-026-56643-x

Медицинская библиотека · Scientific reports · 2026

Deep learning based on multiparametric MRI for differentiating benign from malignant PI-RADS 3 prostate lesions: a dual-center study.

Zhang He, Zheng Yongfei, Ao WeiQun, Ding Jingfeng, Liu Binghui, Huang He, Zhang GuoHua, Huang Danjiang

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

To address the diagnostic challenge of indeterminate PI-RADS 3 prostate lesions, we developed a non-invasive deep learning radiomics model using multiparametric MRI. This dual-center retrospective study included 382 patients. Lesions on T2WI, DWI, and ADC were segmented and standardized. Deep learning features were extracted via ResNet101, and radiomics features were selected using minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). We built and compared three models: clinical, deep-learning radiomics signature (DLRS), and a combined model. The combined model achieved the highest AUCs (0.951, 0.964, 0.925), significantly outperforming the clinical model (p < 0.05). The DLRS model also showed high performance (AUCs: 0.946, 0.932, 0.918). The nomogram was well-calibrated, and DCA indicated clinical utility. This mpMRI-based deep learning model accurately differentiates malignant from benign PI-RADS 3 lesions, offering a valuable non-invasive tool to aid clinical decisions and reduce unnecessary biopsies.

Для цитирования: Zhang He, Zheng Yongfei, Ao WeiQun, Ding Jingfeng, Liu Binghui, Huang He, Zhang GuoHua, Huang Danjiang. Deep learning based on multiparametric MRI for differentiating benign from malignant PI-RADS 3 prostate lesions: a dual-center study.. Scientific reports. 2026. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-56643-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.