MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/0974-8237.193269

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine · 2016

Is the existence of cervical rib an advantage for C7 posterior stabilization?

Ozturk Sait, Yildirim Hanefi, Kaplan Metin

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Defining a new screwing method for C7 posterior stabilization in case of a cervical rib existence aimed in this report.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Ten adult patients, five of which without cervical rib (Group 1) and the other five of which (Group 2) with cervical rib that has been chosen from the radiology archive. Axial, sagittal, coronal sections of cervical computed tomography and three-dimensional images were obtained. Lateral mass sizes of all cases were measured and compared between two groups. The relationship between cervical rib and lateral mass was identified in Group 2.

RESULTS

The mean length, width, and height of lateral masses were measured respectively, as 5.4, 17.6, and 12.7 mm in Group 1. The measurement of Group 2 (with cervical rib) revealed the mean length of 20.7, the width of 20.4, and the height of 15.9 mm. When both groups were compared, there were no significant differences between the width and height of the lateral masses. However, axial measurements of Group 2 revealed a remarkable and significant length for screwing.

CONCLUSION

In patients with cervical rib, directing lateral mass screw toward cervical rib conjoint can present a simple and reliable alternative method in C7 posterior stabilization process.

Для цитирования: Ozturk Sait, Yildirim Hanefi, Kaplan Metin. Is the existence of cervical rib an advantage for C7 posterior stabilization?. Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. 2016. DOI: 10.4103/0974-8237.193269.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.