MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000341089

Медицинская библиотека · Urologia internationalis · 2012

Surgical management of intractable chyluria: a comparison of retroperitoneoscopy with open surgery.

Zhang Yao, Zeng Jiayuan, Zhang Keqin, Jin Fengshuo, Ye Jin, Wu Gang, Wang Gang, Nie Zhilin

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneoscopic renal pedicle lymphatic disconnection has been described in the management of intractable chyluria.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes of 76 patients with intractable chyluria undergoing renal pedicle lymphatic disconnection via a retroperitoneoscopic (n = 59) or conventional open approach (n = 17). Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, volume of postoperative drainage, postoperative draining time, postoperative intestinal recovery, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay were evaluated.

RESULTS

Compared with open surgery, retroperitoneoscopy was superior in terms of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative draining time, postoperative intestinal recovery time, and postoperative hospital stay. Recurrence developed in 2 patients due to the contralateral chylous efflux confirmed by cystoscopy during the period of 9-85 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

With minimal invasion, sparing operative time, less blood loss, and rapid recovery, retroperitoneoscopic renal pedicle lymphatic disconnection can achieve at least the same clinical efficacy as open surgery.

Для цитирования: Zhang Yao, Zeng Jiayuan, Zhang Keqin, Jin Fengshuo, Ye Jin, Wu Gang, Wang Gang, Nie Zhilin. Surgical management of intractable chyluria: a comparison of retroperitoneoscopy with open surgery.. Urologia internationalis. 2012. DOI: 10.1159/000341089.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.