DOI 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.06.018
Posterior tibial perforator-based flaps for leg and foot defects: Indications, limitations, and technical considerations.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Covering defects at the lower leg and foot is a common challenge in reconstructive surgery. A flap is often required, and free flaps are widely used. The posterior tibial perforator-based flap constitutes a valuable option in this situation. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reliability of the posterior tibial perforator-based flap, report any complications, and describe the outcomes, with the goal of defining the indications of this flap in the treatment of lower limb defects.
HYPOTHESIS: The posterior tibial perforator-based flap is a useful and reliable option for soft-tissue defect reconstruction at the leg and foot.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: Patients managed using a posterior tibial perforator-based flap to cover soft-tissue defects of the leg and foot were reviewed retrospectively. A physical examination was performed and radiographs obtained at the last postoperative follow-up visit.
RESULTS
Thirteen patients with a mean age of 46.9 years (range: 25-73 years) were reviewed after a mean follow-up of 19.5 months (range: 16-63 months). The tissue defects were due to compound fractures in 10 patients and to postoperative complications in 3 patients. Mean flap size was 12.3cm by 6.2cm. The donor site was covered by a skin graft in 12 patients and closed primarily in 1 patient. The procedure was successful in 11 (85%) patients.
DISCUSSION: The posterior tibial perforator-based flap is a method of choice for covering soft-tissue defects at the leg and foot. Careful patient selection and flawless technique contribute to minimise the failure rate.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.