Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery · 2010
Evaluation and analysis of formation of bone at the palate in patients with cleft lip and palate after palatoplasty based on computed tomograms and three-dimensional data.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Saijo Hideto, Mori Yoshiyuki, Fujihara Hisako, Kanno Yuki, Chikazu Daichi, Ohkubo Kazumi, Hikiji Hisako, Iino Mitsuyoshi, Yonehara Yoshiyuki, Takato Tsuyoshi
Аннотация
There are various techniques for palatoplasty, but no studies of postoperative osteogenesis at the palatal fissure. In the cranial and maxillofacial region it is thought to develop from the periosteum, so palatoplasty with mucoperiosteal flaps may encourage new bone to form at the fissure. We evaluated the status of osteogenesis in the hard palate after palatoplasty on computed tomograms (CT). We studied 29 patients (22 boys and 7 girls) with unilateral cleft lip and palate who had pushback palatoplasty with the use of CT obtained between May 2003 and March 2007. Age at the time of operation was recorded. The width of the palatal fissure at the first premolar, the first molar, and the maxillary posterior region were measured on coronal CT. The mean (SD) age at the time of palatoplasty was 16 (2) months. The mean (SD) width of the fissure at the first molar was 3.96 (3.1) mm, and bony union was seen in four patients. The width of the fissure was significantly less at the first molar than at the other sites (p = 0.006). The shape of the margin of the fissure was irregular in nearly all patients. The width of the fissure at the first molar became significantly less, suggesting that osteogenesis had occurred. In some patients the height of the fissure differed. Given the results of previous studies, bony regeneration from the periosteum most likely happens together with regeneration from the margins of the fissure.