Comparison of cerclage and pessary in prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancies.
Аннотация
Background
The preterm labor has increased in multiple pregnancies over the past 2 decades. Preterm labor has led to increase in neonatal mortality rates, long-term morbidity, respiratory distress, and neonatal infections. Thus, this study aimed at investigating the effect of cerclage versus pessary on the prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancies.
Methods
This prospective randomized clinical trial was performed on 50 women pregnant with twins who visited Taleghani hospital in 2016-2018. Their cervical length, which was measured by transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS), was less than 30 millimeters at week 14 of pregnancy. The participants were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=25). They separately underwent cervical pessary and cerclage. McDonald's procedure was performed in cerclage group from 14 to 27 weeks. The suture material was Mersilene Ethicon 5-0 double-armed s14 needle. Ring hodge pessary was also inserted in the vagina of the participants in the pessary group. All the patients were injected 250 mg intramuscular 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate weekly from week 16 to week 36. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 18 software.
Results
The results of this study showed that the mean ± standard deviation (SD) for pregnancy length of the cerclage and pessary groups were 238.6±32.4 and 223.6±16.6, respectively. Also, significant differences were found between the 2 groups (p=0.048). No significant difference was found in pregnancy (p=0.565), length of pessary/cerclage use (p=0.491), and BMI before and after delivery between the cerclage and pessary groups (p>0.05).
Conclusion
The use of cerclage in twin pregnancies is recommended to increase the length of pregnancy.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.