DOI 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.103336
Endoscopic anti-reflux mucosal resection for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: Clinical efficacy and impact on gut microbiota.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
In recent years, endoscopic anti-reflux mucosal resection (ARMS) has demonstrated benefits, including good efficacy, ease of operation, low cost, and fewer complications; however, it is still in the exploratory stage.
AIM: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of ARMS in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its effects on the gut microbiota.
METHODS
This single-center, retrospective, self-controlled study included 80 patients with GERD. All patients underwent endoscopic ARMS and were followed for at least 3 months after surgery. The primary outcome measures were changes in the gut microbiota before and after treatment and clinical efficacy.
RESULTS
After surgery, the counts of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus were significantly lower than those before surgery (P < 0.05), whereas the counts of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus were significantly higher than those before surgery (P < 0.05). Symptoms, such as reflux and heartburn, were markedly relieved postoperatively. The average Gerd Q score prior to surgery was 11.32 ± 1.26 points, which decreased to 5.89 ± 0.52 points 3 months after surgery. All patients used proton pump inhibitors before surgery, and the proportion of patients using proton pump inhibitors declined significantly postoperatively. Sixteen patients (20.0%) experienced surgery-related adverse reactions within 2 weeks to 1 month post-surgery. The incidence rates of postoperative esophageal stricture and delayed bleeding were 15.0% and 5.0%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Endoscopic ARMS can effectively alleviate reflux symptoms, maintain gut microbiota balance, and improve gastrointestinal function in patients with GERD.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.