MedElevator
Войти в исследования International journal of obstetric anesthesia · 2014
Assessment of endothelial glycocalyx disruption in term parturients receiving a fluid bolus before spinal anesthesia: a prospective observational study.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Powell M F, Mathru M, Brandon A, Patel R, Frölich M A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Fluid bolus administration is a standard treatment for hypotension. However, the effectiveness of the traditional prophylactic bolus in parturients undergoing spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery has been questioned. One potential mechanism for the failure of a prophylactic fluid bolus to prevent hypotension is hypervolemia-induced destruction of the endothelial glycocalyx, a structure that plays a vital role in regulating intravascular fluid shifts.
METHODS: Thirty healthy parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were recruited. Known endothelial glycocalyx biomarkers, heparan sulfate and syndecan-1 along with atrial natriuretic peptide, were measured before and after a 750-mL crystalloid fluid bolus. Cardiac performance parameters, cardiac index and systemic vascular resistance, were monitored during the fluid bolus using thoracic-impedance cardiography.
RESULTS: A significant increase in both heparan sulfate 96 ng/mg (P=0.0098) and syndecan-1 2.4 ng/mg (P=0.045) were observed after the fluid bolus. There was a non-significant increase in atrial natriuretic peptide 0.6 pg/mg (P=0.293). Cardiac parameters showed a small but significant change; over an average of 15 min, cardiac index increased by 0.1L/min/m2 (P=0.0005) and systemic vascular resistance decreased by 30.7 dyn.s/cm5 (P=0.0025).
CONCLUSIONS: A prophylactic fluid bolus in parturients undergoing spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery disrupts the endothelial glycocalyx, as noted by a statistically significant increase in post-bolus heparan sulfate and syndecan-1 levels. Although studied in the past, atrial natriuretic peptide could not explain this disruption. Our fluid bolus did not have a clinically relevant effect on cardiac performance.
METHODS: Thirty healthy parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were recruited. Known endothelial glycocalyx biomarkers, heparan sulfate and syndecan-1 along with atrial natriuretic peptide, were measured before and after a 750-mL crystalloid fluid bolus. Cardiac performance parameters, cardiac index and systemic vascular resistance, were monitored during the fluid bolus using thoracic-impedance cardiography.
RESULTS: A significant increase in both heparan sulfate 96 ng/mg (P=0.0098) and syndecan-1 2.4 ng/mg (P=0.045) were observed after the fluid bolus. There was a non-significant increase in atrial natriuretic peptide 0.6 pg/mg (P=0.293). Cardiac parameters showed a small but significant change; over an average of 15 min, cardiac index increased by 0.1L/min/m2 (P=0.0005) and systemic vascular resistance decreased by 30.7 dyn.s/cm5 (P=0.0025).
CONCLUSIONS: A prophylactic fluid bolus in parturients undergoing spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery disrupts the endothelial glycocalyx, as noted by a statistically significant increase in post-bolus heparan sulfate and syndecan-1 levels. Although studied in the past, atrial natriuretic peptide could not explain this disruption. Our fluid bolus did not have a clinically relevant effect on cardiac performance.