Blunt cerebrovascular injuries and association with cervical spine injury.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI) associated with cervical spine injuries (CSI) carry a high risk of morbidity and mortality. This nationwide Danish study, covering the years 2017-2023, aimed to identify key BCVI predictors in patients with CSI to support improved early detection and management strategies.
METHODS
The study analysed data from four level-1 trauma centres using the Abbreviated Injury Scale to classify BCVI cases. Factors assessed included age, sex, type of cervical injury and the Injury Severity Score (ISS).
RESULTS
Age and sex were not significant predictors of BCVI (p = 0.12, p = 0.65). However, any form of CSI was a strong predictor (p less-than 0.001; odds ratios (OR) = 26.3; confidence intervals (95% CI): 16.84-41.12), as were cervical spine ligamentous injuries (p = 0.0007; OR = 5.4; 95% CI: 2.3-12.89). An increase in ISS score significantly correlated with BCVI risk (p = 0.001; OR = 1.03 per unit increase; 95% CI: 1.01-1.05). Specific cervical fractures were not independent predictors of BCVI.
CONCLUSIONS
From a Danish cohort of patients admitted to a level 1 trauma centre, we found a BCVI incidence of three per thousand. In case of verified injury to the cervical region, the incidence rose to 6.25%. Our findings underscore the need for increased vigilance and a standardised nationwide algorithm to prevent disability, loss of health-related quality of life, and mortality in CSI patients at risk of BCVI.
FUNDING: The study was funded by Offerfonden, Dagmar Marshall Fonden, and Torben and Alice Frimodt Fonden.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The data collection was approved by the local ethical committee and the Central Denmark Region Office for Research: 1-45-70-19-23.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.