MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00078-1

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of hospital infection · 2003

Prevalence of nosocomial infections in Italy: result from the Lombardy survey in 2000.

Lizioli A, Privitera G, Alliata E, Antonietta Banfi E M, Boselli L, Panceri M L, Perna M C, Porretta A D, Santini M G, Carreri V

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A one-day survey was carried out in 88 out of 113 public hospitals in Lombardy to obtain prevalence rates of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) by hospital departments and to identify the pathogens more frequently involved. In total 18667 patients were surveyed, representing 72% of the average daily total of occupied beds in public hospitals in Lombardy. The overall prevalence of HAI was 4.9%. The highest prevalence was observed in intensive care units and in spinal units. The prevalence of bloodstream infections was 0.6%; pneumonia 1.1%; urinary tract infections 1.6% and gastrointestinal infections 0.4%. In surgical patients the prevalence of surgical site infections was 2.7%. The most frequently isolated pathogen from all sites of infections was Escherichia coli (16.8%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (15.0%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13.2%) and Candida spp. (8.7%). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus accounted for 23% of all isolated S. aureus. The results provide baseline data for rational priorities in allocation of resources, for further studies and for infection control activities.

Для цитирования: Lizioli A, Privitera G, Alliata E, Antonietta Banfi E M, Boselli L, Panceri M L, Perna M C, Porretta A D, Santini M G, Carreri V. Prevalence of nosocomial infections in Italy: result from the Lombardy survey in 2000.. The Journal of hospital infection. 2003. DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00078-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.