DOI 10.1080/10790268.2016.1275446
Acute effects of glossopharyngeal insufflation in people with cervical spinal cord injury.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate acute effects of glossopharyngeal insufflation (GI) on lung function, airway pressure (Paw), blood pressure and heart rate (HR) in people with cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI).
DESIGN
Case-control design.
SETTING
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
PARTICIPANTS
Ten participants with CSCI suffering from lesions between C4 and C8, and ASIA classification of A or B were recruited. Ten healthy particpants familiar with GI were recruited as a reference group.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Spirometry, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), Paw, and HR were measured in a sitting and a supine position before, during, and after GI.
RESULTS
GI in the study group in a sitting position increased total lung capacity (TLC) by 712 ml: P < 0.001, vital capacity (VC) by 587 ml: P < 0.0001, Paw by 13 cm H2O: P < 0.01, and HR by 10 beats/min: P < 0.001. MAP decreased by 25 mmHg, P < 0.0001. Significant differences were observed between groups comparing baseline with GI. The reference group had a higher increase in; TLC (P < 0.01), VC (P < 0.001), Paw (P < 0.001) and HR (P < 0.05) and a higher decrease in MAP (P < 0.001). With GI in a sitting compared to a supine position, TLC, MAP, HR, Paw remained unchanged in the study group, while residual volume decreased in the supine position (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION
There was a difference between the groups in the increase in TLC; VC; Paw, HR and in the decrease in MAP with GI, however MAP, HR and Paw responded in similar way in both groups in a sitting as well as a supine position. If performed correctly, the risks of GI resulting in clinically significant hemodynamic changes is low, although syncope may still occur.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.