MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.09.008

Медицинская библиотека · Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2007

Current diagnosis and treatment of laryngocele in adults.

Dursun Gursel, Ozgursoy Ozan B, Beton Suha, Batikhan Hunkar

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the treatment outcome of a series of laryngoceles and to comment on the current diagnosis and management of laryngoceles.

STUDY DESIGN AND

SETTING

A retrospective review of charts, radiological and histopathological notes, videolaryngostroboscopic records, and acoustic voice analyses of patients with laryngocele treated over a 10-year period was undertaken.

RESULTS

Seven patients had internal laryngoceles; one had external; another one had combined laryngocele. Patients with internal laryngocele underwent endoscopic CO2 laser resection, while those with external or combined laryngocele were treated via external approach. Quality of voice was improved and no recurrences were encountered during the follow-up. No evidence of laryngeal cancer was found on the histological examinations.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic CO2 laser resection of internal laryngocele provides a reliable and cost-effective method that minimizes hospitalization and the need for tracheotomy. We believe that advances in the applications of laser in microlaryngosurgery will alter the traditional management of all type of laryngoceles.

Для цитирования: Dursun Gursel, Ozgursoy Ozan B, Beton Suha, Batikhan Hunkar. Current diagnosis and treatment of laryngocele in adults.. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.09.008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.