Expert opinion on drug safety · 2024
Comparative analysis of adverse events among intravesical drugs in bladder cancer: a real-world study on FAERS database.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Peng Yun, Song Yuxuan, Du Yiqing, Qin Caipeng, Xu Tao
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Intravesical therapy is a commonly utilized treatment for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). This study focuses on summarizing the signals of all intravesical drugs and aims to highlight the comprehensive differences in adverse events (AEs) between these drugs.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted pharmacovigilance data analysis based on the real-world big data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.
RESULTS: We elucidated all signals compared with the overall FAERS database or other administration routes for Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), mitomycin, gemcitabine, valrubicin, and epirubicin. Notably, the distribution of reported AEs associated with intravesical therapy exhibited a noticeable inclination toward male patients. Furthermore, all five drugs demonstrated a disproportionate distribution in local AEs, particularly in renal and urinary disorders. Additionally, specific signals and findings were summarized for each individual drug. Finally, we highlighted the AEs that resulted in serious outcomes for each drug.
CONCLUSION: We have compiled an overview of the AEs tied to intravesical drugs whilst considering their individual distinctions. These insightful findings serve to enrich our comprehension of the safety profiles and potential risks linked to intravesical therapy.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted pharmacovigilance data analysis based on the real-world big data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.
RESULTS: We elucidated all signals compared with the overall FAERS database or other administration routes for Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), mitomycin, gemcitabine, valrubicin, and epirubicin. Notably, the distribution of reported AEs associated with intravesical therapy exhibited a noticeable inclination toward male patients. Furthermore, all five drugs demonstrated a disproportionate distribution in local AEs, particularly in renal and urinary disorders. Additionally, specific signals and findings were summarized for each individual drug. Finally, we highlighted the AEs that resulted in serious outcomes for each drug.
CONCLUSION: We have compiled an overview of the AEs tied to intravesical drugs whilst considering their individual distinctions. These insightful findings serve to enrich our comprehension of the safety profiles and potential risks linked to intravesical therapy.