MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1302/0301-620x.94b2.27381

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume · 2012

Multiple fractures in the elderly.

Clement N D, Aitken S, Duckworth A D, McQueen M M, Court-Brown C M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We present the prevalence of multiple fractures in the elderly in a single catchment population of 780,000 treated over a 12-month period and describe the mechanisms of injury, common patterns of occurrence, management, and the associated mortality rate. A total of 2335 patients, aged ≥ 65 years of age, were prospectively assessed and of these 119 patients (5.1%) presented with multiple fractures. Distal radial (odds ratio (OR) 5.1, p < 0.0001), proximal humeral (OR 2.2, p < 0.0001) and pelvic (OR 4.9, p < 0.0001) fractures were associated with an increased risk of sustaining associated fractures. Only 4.5% of patients sustained multiple fractures after a simple fall, but due to the frequency of falls in the elderly this mechanism resulted in 80.7% of all multiple fractures. Most patients required admission (> 80%), of whom 42% did not need an operation but more than half needed an increased level of care before discharge (54%). The standardised mortality rate at one year was significantly greater after sustaining multiple fractures that included fractures of the pelvis, proximal humerus or proximal femur (p < 0.001). This mortality risk increased further if patients were < 80 years of age, indicating that the existence of multiple fractures after low-energy trauma is a marker of mortality.

Для цитирования: Clement N D, Aitken S, Duckworth A D, McQueen M M, Court-Brown C M. Multiple fractures in the elderly.. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume. 2012. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.94b2.27381.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.