Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease · 2002
Evaluation of seven different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for serodiagnosis of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ryding U, Espersen F, Söderquist B, Christensson B
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Serologic assays for Staphylococcus aureus antibodies were evaluated regarding their ability to differentiate between uncomplicated and complicated S. aureus bacteremia, between S. aureus and non-S. aureus bacteremia, and between S. aureus and non-S. aureus endocarditis.
METHODS: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were performed to measure Ig G antibodies against seven S. aureus antigens (peptidoglycan, teichoic acid, S. aureus ultrasonicate, whole S. aureus cells, alpha-toxin, lipase and capsular polysaccharide) in 129 patients with S. aureus bacteremia (including 51 with endocarditis), 78 patients with non-S. aureus bacteremia (including 27 with endocarditis) and 100 febrile non-bacteremic controls.
RESULTS: Whole-cell ELISA was the most sensitive assay. The specificity of all assays was low. Two different combinations of ELISAs for whole cells, teichoic acid,alpha-toxin, lipase and capsular polysaccharide did distinguish between S. aureus and non-S. aureus endocarditis, but not between uncomplicated and complicated S. aureus bacteremia.
METHODS: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were performed to measure Ig G antibodies against seven S. aureus antigens (peptidoglycan, teichoic acid, S. aureus ultrasonicate, whole S. aureus cells, alpha-toxin, lipase and capsular polysaccharide) in 129 patients with S. aureus bacteremia (including 51 with endocarditis), 78 patients with non-S. aureus bacteremia (including 27 with endocarditis) and 100 febrile non-bacteremic controls.
RESULTS: Whole-cell ELISA was the most sensitive assay. The specificity of all assays was low. Two different combinations of ELISAs for whole cells, teichoic acid,alpha-toxin, lipase and capsular polysaccharide did distinguish between S. aureus and non-S. aureus endocarditis, but not between uncomplicated and complicated S. aureus bacteremia.