Hepato-gastroenterology · 2012
Surgical technique for the transperineal approach of anterior levatorplasty and recto-vaginal septum reinforcement in rectocele patients with soiling and postoperative clinical outcomes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tomita Ryouichi, Ikeda Taro, Fujisaki Shigeru, Sugito Kiminobu, Sakurai Kenichi, Koshinaga Tsugumichi, Shibata Masahiko
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To clarify the significance of a transperineal approach of anterior levatorplasty (ALP) and recto-vaginal septum reinforcement in rectocele patients with soiling, we reported the surgical technique and clinical outcomes two years after this operation.
METHODOLOGY: Twelve female patients (33-82 years, average 63.3) complaining of defecation disorders (disturbed defecation including excessive straining during defecation, sensation of incomplete defecation and manual assistance of digitation of the vagina) with soiling underwent the following surgical technique: under spinal anesthesia, rectal wall was opened up to the end of the rectal wall weakness. Rectocele in the weak rectal wall was horizontally sutured. Before closing wound ALP was fashioned.
RESULTS: In clinical outcomes, excessive straining during defecation, sensation of incomplete evacuation and defecation by manual assistance were statistically significantly reduced postoperatively after a follow-up of 2 years (p<0.01, p<0.01, p<0.0001, p<0.01, respectively). As an early postoperative complication, perineal wound infection was noted in one patient. Late postoperative complications were not noted in any patient. In overall patient satisfaction 2 years after operation, half of the patients were excellent and no patients were poor.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined repair of rectocele and ALP by transperineal approach may be a useful procedure for correcting rectocele with soiling. This procedure is also easy and safe.
METHODOLOGY: Twelve female patients (33-82 years, average 63.3) complaining of defecation disorders (disturbed defecation including excessive straining during defecation, sensation of incomplete defecation and manual assistance of digitation of the vagina) with soiling underwent the following surgical technique: under spinal anesthesia, rectal wall was opened up to the end of the rectal wall weakness. Rectocele in the weak rectal wall was horizontally sutured. Before closing wound ALP was fashioned.
RESULTS: In clinical outcomes, excessive straining during defecation, sensation of incomplete evacuation and defecation by manual assistance were statistically significantly reduced postoperatively after a follow-up of 2 years (p<0.01, p<0.01, p<0.0001, p<0.01, respectively). As an early postoperative complication, perineal wound infection was noted in one patient. Late postoperative complications were not noted in any patient. In overall patient satisfaction 2 years after operation, half of the patients were excellent and no patients were poor.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined repair of rectocele and ALP by transperineal approach may be a useful procedure for correcting rectocele with soiling. This procedure is also easy and safe.