MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00004728-200109000-00003

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of computer assisted tomography · 2001

Injuries to the distal gastrocnemius muscle: MR findings.

Weishaupt D, Schweitzer M E, Morrison W B

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to demonstrate the MR findings of injuries to the distal gastrocnemius muscle.

METHOD: Twenty patients with clinically confirmed injuries to the distal gastrocnemius muscle underwent MRI. The injuries were evaluated with regard to abnormal morphology or signal abnormality, site, and degree of tearing.

RESULTS

Twenty-three injuries to the distal gastrocnemius occurred in 20 patients, with involvement of the myotendinous junction in 22 of 23 (96%) injuries. An interstitial tear of the proximal Achilles tendon was present in one instance. Myotendinous strains were the most common injuries (10/23; 43%); partial tears (7/23; 30%) and complete tears (5/23; 22%) of the myotendinous junction or proximal Achilles tendon were less frequent. When an injury to the gastrocnemius myotendinous junction was present, involvement of the medial head (19/22; 86%) was more frequent than involvement of the lateral head (3/22; 14%).

CONCLUSION

MRI allows accurate imaging of distal gastrocnemius muscle injuries. When occurring, distal gastrocnemius muscle injuries most frequently involve the myotendinous junction of the medial gastrocnemius head and occasionally the lateral gastrocnemius head or the proximal Achilles tendon.

Для цитирования: Weishaupt D, Schweitzer M E, Morrison W B. Injuries to the distal gastrocnemius muscle: MR findings.. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 2001. DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200109000-00003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.