MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.08.016

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of hand surgery · 2012

Interobserver variability among radiologists for diagnosis of scaphoid fractures by computed tomography.

de Zwart Andele D, Beeres Frank J P, Kingma Lucas M, Otoide Marleen, Schipper Inger B, Rhemrev Steven J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To determine the interobserver variability among radiologists for computed tomography (CT) diagnosis of scaphoid fractures.

METHODS

Four specialized musculoskeletal radiologists evaluated the CT scans of 150 consecutive patients who were clinically suspected of having sustained a scaphoid fracture but whose scaphoid-specific radiographs were normal. The radiologists were asked to determine the presence or absence of a scaphoid fracture and to localize the fracture. Interobserver agreement was calculated using the kappa statistic.

RESULTS

The radiologists diagnosed between 11 (7%) and 22 (15%) scaphoid fractures; the kappa value was 0.51.

CONCLUSION

Agreement on the presence of a scaphoid fracture and its location on a CT scan was moderate among the 4 radiologists. This finding raises the question as to whether scaphoid fractures could be under- or overdiagnosed in daily practice when CT is used to exclude or confirm a fracture. This should be kept in mind when interpreting clinical and radiological results in patients with suspected scaphoid fractures.

Для цитирования: de Zwart Andele D, Beeres Frank J P, Kingma Lucas M, Otoide Marleen, Schipper Inger B, Rhemrev Steven J. Interobserver variability among radiologists for diagnosis of scaphoid fractures by computed tomography.. The Journal of hand surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.08.016.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.