MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5468/ogs.2014.57.5.393

Медицинская библиотека · Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2014

Actinomyces-like organisms in cervical smears: the association with intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory diseases.

Kim Yeo Joo, Youm Jina, Kim Jee Hyun, Jee Byung Chul

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the incidence of actinomyces-like organisms in routine cervical smears of Korean women and to evaluate its association with the development of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) in these women.

METHODS

The results of cervical smears between 2011 and 2012 at a single university hospital were searched. If positive for actinomyces-like organisms, the medical record of the patient was searched and development of PID was followed. If the data were not available in the medical record, the patient was contacted by telephone.

RESULTS

The incidence of actinomyces-like organisms in cervical smears was 0.26% (52/20,390). Forty-two women (80.8%) were intrauterine device (IUD) users: the copper-IUD in 25 women and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in 13 women (type unknown in 4 women). The majority (71.4%, 30/42) of the IUD users maintained the IUD. Prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed to 12 women. Two continuous IUD users were later diagnosed with PID, but these cases were not pelvic actinomycosis.

CONCLUSION

It would be a reasonable option to choose the expectant management for asymptomatic women who incidentally showed actinomyces-like organisms in their cervical smear.

Для цитирования: Kim Yeo Joo, Youm Jina, Kim Jee Hyun, Jee Byung Chul. Actinomyces-like organisms in cervical smears: the association with intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory diseases.. Obstetrics & gynecology science. 2014. DOI: 10.5468/ogs.2014.57.5.393.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.