MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/alr.22929

Медицинская библиотека · International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2022

International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction.

Patel Zara M, Holbrook Eric H, Turner Justin H, Adappa Nithin D, Albers Mark W, Altundag Aytug, Appenzeller Simone, Costanzo Richard M, Croy Ilona, Davis Greg E, Dehgani-Mobaraki Puya, Doty Richard L, Duffy Valerie B, Goldstein Bradley J, Gudis David A, Haehner Antje, Higgins Thomas S, Hopkins Claire, Huart Caroline, Hummel Thomas, Jitaroon Kawinyarat, Kern Robert C, Khanwalkar Ashoke R, Kobayashi Masayoshi, Kondo Kenji, Lane Andrew P, Lechner Matt, Leopold Donald A, Levy Joshua M, Marmura Michael J, Mclelland Lisha, Miwa Takaki, Moberg Paul J, Mueller Christian A, Nigwekar Sagar U, O'Brien Erin K, Paunescu Teodor G, Pellegrino Robert, Philpott Carl, Pinto Jayant M, Reiter Evan R, Roalf David R, Rowan Nicholas R, Schlosser Rodney J, Schwob James, Seiden Allen M, Smith Timothy L, Soler Zachary M, Sowerby Leigh, Tan Bruce K, Thamboo Andrew, Wrobel Bozena, Yan Carol H

СтатьяОбзорConsensus StatementПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The literature regarding clinical olfaction, olfactory loss, and olfactory dysfunction has expanded rapidly over the past two decades, with an exponential rise in the past year. There is substantial variability in the quality of this literature and a need to consolidate and critically review the evidence. It is with that aim that we have gathered experts from around the world to produce this International Consensus on Allergy and Rhinology: Olfaction (ICAR:O).

METHODS

Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to olfaction. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review, or evidence-based review with recommendations format as dictated by available evidence and scope within the ICAR:O document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:O document was integrated and reviewed by all authors for final consensus.

RESULTS

The ICAR:O document reviews nearly 100 separate topics within the realm of olfaction, including diagnosis, epidemiology, disease burden, diagnosis, testing, etiology, treatment, and associated pathologies.

CONCLUSION

This critical review of the existing clinical olfaction literature provides much needed insight and clarity into the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with olfactory dysfunction, while also clearly delineating gaps in our knowledge and evidence base that we should investigate further.

Для цитирования: Patel Zara M, Holbrook Eric H, Turner Justin H, Adappa Nithin D, Albers Mark W, Altundag Aytug, Appenzeller Simone, Costanzo Richard M, Croy Ilona, Davis Greg E, Dehgani-Mobaraki Puya, Doty Richard L, Duffy Valerie B, Goldstein Bradley J, Gudis David A, Haehner Antje, Higgins Thomas S, Hopkins Claire, Huart Caroline, Hummel Thomas, Jitaroon Kawinyarat, Kern Robert C, Khanwalkar Ashoke R, Kobayashi Masayoshi, Kondo Kenji, Lane Andrew P, Lechner Matt, Leopold Donald A, Levy Joshua M, Marmura Michael J, Mclelland Lisha, Miwa Takaki, Moberg Paul J, Mueller Christian A, Nigwekar Sagar U, O'Brien Erin K, Paunescu Teodor G, Pellegrino Robert, Philpott Carl, Pinto Jayant M, Reiter Evan R, Roalf David R, Rowan Nicholas R, Schlosser Rodney J, Schwob James, Seiden Allen M, Smith Timothy L, Soler Zachary M, Sowerby Leigh, Tan Bruce K, Thamboo Andrew, Wrobel Bozena, Yan Carol H. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction.. International forum of allergy & rhinology. 2022. DOI: 10.1002/alr.22929.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.