Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025
Impact of Casein Phosphopeptide Amorphous Calcium Phosphate and Proanthocyanidin on Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives to Caries-Affected Dentin in Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nozari Ali, Haji Abbas Oghli Farnaz, Parvizi Fatemeh, Jowkar Zahra, Pakniyat Jahromi Maryam, Hamidi Seyed Ahmadreza
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the impact of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) and proanthocyanidin (PA) on the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of universal adhesives to caries-affected dentin (CAD) in primary teeth.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 160 human primary second molars with occlusal caries were utilized, with CAD-exposed dentin surfaces. The teeth were categorized into four groups based on CAD pretreatment: no pretreatment, CPP-ACP for 3 min, PA for 1 min, and PA for 1 min followed by CPP-ACP for 3 min. Each group subdivided into four based on adhesive system (Gluma Bond Universal or All-Bond Universal) and application mode (etch and rinse; E&R or self-etch; SE). Following composite resin restoration, μSBS measurements were taken after 24 h of water storage.
RESULTS: PA pretreatment showed the highest μSBS compared to controls and other methods (p < 0.001). Conversely, CAD pretreatment with CPP-ACP + PA led to lower μSBS than the control (p = 0.009). Universal adhesive choice significantly influenced μSBS (p < 0.001), with Gluma Bond Universal outperforming All-Bond Universal (p < 0.001). The E&R method demonstrated superior bond strength over SE (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: CAD pretreatment, particularly with PA, significantly impacted bond strength, with Gluma Bond Universal and the E&R method proving optimal for enhancing μSBS to CAD. These findings offer valuable insights for refining adhesive protocols in pediatric dentistry, potentially improving clinical outcomes in restorative procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 160 human primary second molars with occlusal caries were utilized, with CAD-exposed dentin surfaces. The teeth were categorized into four groups based on CAD pretreatment: no pretreatment, CPP-ACP for 3 min, PA for 1 min, and PA for 1 min followed by CPP-ACP for 3 min. Each group subdivided into four based on adhesive system (Gluma Bond Universal or All-Bond Universal) and application mode (etch and rinse; E&R or self-etch; SE). Following composite resin restoration, μSBS measurements were taken after 24 h of water storage.
RESULTS: PA pretreatment showed the highest μSBS compared to controls and other methods (p < 0.001). Conversely, CAD pretreatment with CPP-ACP + PA led to lower μSBS than the control (p = 0.009). Universal adhesive choice significantly influenced μSBS (p < 0.001), with Gluma Bond Universal outperforming All-Bond Universal (p < 0.001). The E&R method demonstrated superior bond strength over SE (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: CAD pretreatment, particularly with PA, significantly impacted bond strength, with Gluma Bond Universal and the E&R method proving optimal for enhancing μSBS to CAD. These findings offer valuable insights for refining adhesive protocols in pediatric dentistry, potentially improving clinical outcomes in restorative procedures.