DOI 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.07.018
Open side-to-side repair for non-repairable tendon-to-bone rotator cuff tear. Clinical and anatomic outcome at a mean 5 years' follow-up.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Anatomical tendon-to-bone repair of retracted rotator cuff tear is a difficult challenge given the high rate of recurrence.
HYPOTHESIS: The study hypothesis was that side-to-side repair of U-shaped retracted tear allows tendon healing with satisfactory medium-term clinical results.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Between 1999 and 2007, 35 patients (mean age 53.5 years) were operated on with this open technique. On the De Orio and Cofield classification, tendon lesions were medium in 5 cases, large in 25 and massive in 5. Subacromial space was in all cases greater than 7 mm. Fatty infiltration grade was less than or equal to 2 on Goutallier's classification in all cases except for 1 grade3 (supraspinatus only). At last follow-up, patients were assessed clinically (Constant score) and radiographically. Tendon healing was assessed by ultrasound (31 cases) or CT-arthrography (4 cases).
RESULTS
Mean follow-up was 60 months. Constant score improved significantly, from 64.7 ± 10 preoperatively to 77.1 ± 14 postoperatively (P < 0.05). Recurrence rate was 17.1%. Subacromial space was < 6 mm postoperatively in 2 cases.
DISCUSSION: Side-to-side repair, bringing the posterior cuff onto the anterior edge of the tear, allowed tension-free repair of retracted tear if the preoperative reparability criteria are met: subacromial space equal to or greater than 7 mm, and absence of fatty infiltration significantly greater than grade 2 on the Goutallier classification. Under these conditions, clinical and anatomical results were satisfactory at a mean 5 years' follow-up.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.