Heterogeneity in English as a Foreign Language: Skills Among Norwegian 6th Graders with Dyslexia-The Impact of Language Comprehension and Processing Profiles.
Аннотация
Background
English as a first foreign language (EFL) is often difficult for students with dyslexia. This study maps a broad range of EFL verbal and literacy skills in 6th graders with dyslexia compared to a control group.
Methods
Participants were 127 controls (CON) and 60 students with dyslexia (DYS), split into dys+ and dys- by their comprehension scores. They were tested with "The English 2 Dyslexia Test" containing seven subtests within three domains: Sentences, Pragmatics, and Literacy. The data were analysed in Part 1: domains and groups, and in Part 2: linguistic skills and spelling by groups.
Results
Part 1. CON scored better than DYS on all tests. However, the differences between the two subgroups, dys+ and dys-, were larger than expected. Dys+ scored in line with CON on several tests, while dys- scored below CON on all tests and lower than dys+ on all except for spelling. Part 2. Minor differences were seen between CON and dys+ in linguistic skills, and both CON and dys+ scored higher than dys-. Spelling was scored by the number of graphemes. CON scored higher than both dys+ and dys-, with no difference between the subgroups.
Conclusions
The results were discussed in accordance with neurocognitive theories of the auditory and visual timing systems. The overall low scores in dys- were mainly attributed to auditory processing problems, while the specific low spelling scores in dys+ were mainly attributed to visual processing problems. More research is needed on how the behavioural patterns in the two dyslexia subgroups relate to neural correlates in the meeting between EFL and different L1 language typologies and orthographies.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.