Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2026
Efficacy, Influencing Factors and Prediction Models of Type A Botulinum Toxin in Treating Glabellar Lines.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Kunpeng, Chen Yaokun, Chen Xuefen, Huang Yusi, Zhou Linsa, Meng Xiang, Xie Qihu, Chen Jiasheng, Zhong Xiaoping
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Botulinum Toxin Type A (BoNT/A) injection for glabellar lines is popular due to its minimally invasive nature, safety, and efficacy. However, injection techniques and factors influencing outcomes need further study. This study compares three-point and five-point injection techniques and constructs a predictive model based on five-point injection results.
METHODS: 444 patients were divided into three-point (219) and five-point (225) injection groups. Wrinkle improvement was assessed using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) and Patient-Rated Facial Wrinkle Severity Scale (PFWS), and complications were recorded. A retrospective analysis of 259 patients (including new patients) receiving five-point injections was conducted. A nomogram prediction model was built using multivariable logistic regression and evaluated using ROC curves, calibration curves, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Decision curve analysis validated its clinical applicability.
RESULTS: The five-point technique had significantly higher long-term efficacy (P=0.041) and similar complication rates to the three-point technique. Age, pretreatment patient self-assessment, physician scores, and procedure time influenced outcomes. Age and moderate-to-severe pretreatment resting physician scores were risk factors for inefficacy, while severe pretreatment patient and physician scores were protective. The nomogram model showed excellent discriminative ability (AUC=0.836) and good consistency.
CONCLUSION: The five-point BoNT/A injection technique offers superior long-term efficacy and safety. Age and pretreatment scores affect outcomes. The nomogram model effectively evaluates postoperative outcomes, providing a scientific basis for personalized treatment plans and improving patient satisfaction.
METHODS: 444 patients were divided into three-point (219) and five-point (225) injection groups. Wrinkle improvement was assessed using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) and Patient-Rated Facial Wrinkle Severity Scale (PFWS), and complications were recorded. A retrospective analysis of 259 patients (including new patients) receiving five-point injections was conducted. A nomogram prediction model was built using multivariable logistic regression and evaluated using ROC curves, calibration curves, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Decision curve analysis validated its clinical applicability.
RESULTS: The five-point technique had significantly higher long-term efficacy (P=0.041) and similar complication rates to the three-point technique. Age, pretreatment patient self-assessment, physician scores, and procedure time influenced outcomes. Age and moderate-to-severe pretreatment resting physician scores were risk factors for inefficacy, while severe pretreatment patient and physician scores were protective. The nomogram model showed excellent discriminative ability (AUC=0.836) and good consistency.
CONCLUSION: The five-point BoNT/A injection technique offers superior long-term efficacy and safety. Age and pretreatment scores affect outcomes. The nomogram model effectively evaluates postoperative outcomes, providing a scientific basis for personalized treatment plans and improving patient satisfaction.