MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/cea.14633

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025

An Economic Evaluation of Direct Oral Penicillin Challenge for De-Labelling Low Risk Patients With a Penicillin Allergy Label.

Bestwick R, Bhogal R, Kildonaviciute K, Ng B Y, Jackson B, Moriarty C, Thomas C, Savic L, Misbah S A, Krishna M T, Mujica-Mota R

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Removing inaccurate penicillin allergy labels (PALs) can reduce unnecessary exposure to 'watch' and 'reserve' groups of antibiotics and thereby reduce antimicrobial resistance. The most efficient model for a non-allergy-specialist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling (PADL) service has not been established.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the costs to the UK National Health Service of a direct oral penicillin challenge (DPC) for low-risk patients with a PAL in three hospitals in England, each with a different non-allergy-specialist delivery model: pharmacist-led, nurse-led, and mixed multidisciplinary.

METHODS

Cost analysis of the DPC pathway, including resources related to staff time and antibiotics. The effect of de-labelling on healthcare utilisation over 5 years was modelled using data from the published literature.

RESULTS

In total, 2257 patients from the Acute Medical or Infectious Disease Unit (AMU/IDU), Pre-surgical, and Haematology-Oncology departments were screened. Subsequently, 126 underwent DPC, and 122 were de-labelled. Twenty-two of these were de-labelled in time to affect their antibiotic regimen; 6 from AMU/IDU and 16 Pre-surgery. The DPC represented 22%-23% of the pathway cost in the pharmacist-led and mixed models, and 15% in the nurse-led model. Across departments and models, the cost per de-labelled patient varied between £577 (95% Credible Interval: 370, 633) for haematology-oncology patients to £2329 (947, 19,504) for AMU/IDU patients, both under the nurse-led model. After 5 years, recouping costs was unlikely for AMU/IDU patients under any model or for all patients combined under the mixed model.

CONCLUSIONS

The penicillin allergy de-labelling pathway cost was  ≥ 4-fold that of the DPC alone. Costs were up to 3 times higher in an acute compared to an elective setting. No short-term cost savings were identified from proactive or opportunistic penicillin allergy de-labelling in this study.

Для цитирования: Bestwick R, Bhogal R, Kildonaviciute K, Ng B Y, Jackson B, Moriarty C, Thomas C, Savic L, Misbah S A, Krishna M T, Mujica-Mota R. An Economic Evaluation of Direct Oral Penicillin Challenge for De-Labelling Low Risk Patients With a Penicillin Allergy Label.. Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2025. DOI: 10.1111/cea.14633.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.