MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5704/moj.2303.006

Медицинская библиотека · Malaysian orthopaedic journal · 2023

Improving the Accuracy of Corrective Osteotomy for Congenital Radio Ulnar Synostosis using the Axis of Rotation of the Forearm as a Guide.

Gandhi S, Dalei T R, Nema S K, Rathod A, Jagadevan M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Despite several techniques for corrective osteotomy in congenital radioulnar synostosis (CRUS) the published literature lacks a guide for radiographic planning and rationale for the site and level of the osteotomy. The primary objective of this study is to report a technique of radiographically controlled corrective osteotomy using the axis of rotation of the forearm in CRUS.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Children with CRUS underwent corrective osteotomy based on radiographic planning; the extent of rotational correction and functional outcomes were assessed at a mean of 27 months after the operation.

RESULTS

Seven forearms in six children of an average of 6.25 years were assessed for correction and functional outcomes. The average pre-operative pronation deformity was 71.5°. The average correction achieved was 64°. At follow-up, there were five excellent and two good functional outcomes. All children could perform daily tasks besides eating with hand and personal hygiene.

CONCLUSION

Radiographic determination of the osteotomy sites by the method described is effective, consistent, and reproducible in achieving optimal functional outcomes in congenital radioulnar synostosis.

Для цитирования: Gandhi S, Dalei T R, Nema S K, Rathod A, Jagadevan M. Improving the Accuracy of Corrective Osteotomy for Congenital Radio Ulnar Synostosis using the Axis of Rotation of the Forearm as a Guide.. Malaysian orthopaedic journal. 2023. DOI: 10.5704/moj.2303.006.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.