MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00423-026-03990-y

Медицинская библиотека · Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026

Clinical study on the application of biological mesh and synthetic mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Chang Shuai, Zhao Yao, Zhang Di, Li Shunle, Zhai Hongjun, Ji Hong

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 200 patients who underwent laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) between March 2019 and March 2022. Patients were divided into Group A (n = 100), repaired with acellular matrix biological mesh, and Group B (n = 100), repaired with polypropylene mesh. Follow-ups were performed at 1, 3, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years postoperatively. Outcome measures included operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, recurrence, infection, seroma, foreign body sensation, and chronic pain.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the two groups in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, recurrence, infection, seroma, or chronic pain (P > 0.05). However, the incidence of foreign body sensation was significantly lower in the Group A (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The acellular matrix biological mesh is safe and effective in the treatment of inguinal hernia, and can reduce the incidence of postoperative foreign body sensation at the same time, providing a new choice for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Для цитирования: Chang Shuai, Zhao Yao, Zhang Di, Li Shunle, Zhai Hongjun, Ji Hong. Clinical study on the application of biological mesh and synthetic mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.. Langenbeck's archives of surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-026-03990-y.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.