MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2147/opth.s621686

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026

Defining Criteria for Choosing Corneal Neurotization in Neurotrophic Keratopathy: A Systematic Review Along with Practical Advices.

Gaeta Alessandro, Di Maria Alessandra, Ottonelli Giovanni, Celada Ballanti Jacopo, Cuccu Alberto, Coco Giulia, Fogagnolo Paolo, Bolognesi Federico, Biglioli Federico, Giannaccare Giuseppe

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To identify and harmonize preoperative inclusion and exclusion criteria for corneal neurotization (CN) in neurotrophic keratopathy (NK), describe how consistently they are reported, and summarize practical, clinic-ready guidance for selection and follow-up.

METHODS

Systematic review (PRISMA-2020; PROSPERO CRD420251117787) of human studies on CN for NK (databases searched July 18, 2025). Study-level eligibility criteria, disease stage, esthesiometry, chronicity thresholds, donor-nerve requirements, and stated exclusions were evaluated; risk of bias (ROBINS-I) and certainty (GRADE) were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies (380 patients) were included; of these, 26 (72.2%) explicitly reported eligibility criteria. Most common inclusion criteria were refractory NK (92.3%), severe/objective corneal anaesthesia or Mackie III severity stage (69.2%), NK with intact donor territory (50.0%), and corneal epithelial instability (46.2%). Exclusion criteria were often not stated (76.9%); when present, they most often listed active infection/non-NK disease (38.5%), systemic unsuitability (34.6%), absent/abnormal donor nerve(s) (15.4%), and severe limbal stem cell deficiency (15.4%). Across studies, CN improved corneal protection and surface stability with sensory recovery over ~6-18 months and in vivo confocal microscopy evidence of nerve regrowth; visual acuity changes were variable. No randomized clinical trials were found; ROBINS-I was commonly moderate to serious, and overall certainty by GRADE was low.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review defined and harmonized preoperative inclusion and exclusion criteria for CN in NK. A minimum preoperative dataset, including disease stage, mapped corneal sensitivity, denervation timeline and etiology, donor-dermatome integrity, feasibility of tension-free coaptation, and ocular surface status, may guide referral timing, donor-feasibility-driven technique selection, and structured follow-up.

Для цитирования: Gaeta Alessandro, Di Maria Alessandra, Ottonelli Giovanni, Celada Ballanti Jacopo, Cuccu Alberto, Coco Giulia, Fogagnolo Paolo, Bolognesi Federico, Biglioli Federico, Giannaccare Giuseppe. Defining Criteria for Choosing Corneal Neurotization in Neurotrophic Keratopathy: A Systematic Review Along with Practical Advices.. Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.). 2026. DOI: 10.2147/opth.s621686.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.