MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19610085.x

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of anatomy · 2000

Quantitative analysis of the anatomy of the epineurium of the canine recurrent laryngeal nerve.

Barkmeier J M, Luschei E S

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the amount of epineurium surrounding the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) compared with a limb nerve, that to flexor hallicus longus (NFHL). Nerve samples were obtained from 10 adult dogs and studied using scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy to measure the relative proportion of epineurium and the relative proportions of adipose and collagenous tissue comprising the epineurium in both nerves. Significantly greater relative epineurial cross-sectional areas and adipose content were found in the RLN than in the NFHL. Based on observations on noncranial peripheral nerves, the findings indicate that the RLN is better protected against deformational forces associated with compression than stretching forces. The RLN may not be structured well for successful reinnervation after injury. The patterns observed for adipose tissue in RLN epineurial tissue appeared unique compared with those previously reported in peripheral nerves. The primary role associated with adipose tissue is to 'package' the nerve for protection. The RLN is considered to be a vital nerve in the body, as are other cranial nerves. The large proportions of adipose tissue in the epineurium may relate to the importance of protecting this nerve from injury.

Для цитирования: Barkmeier J M, Luschei E S. Quantitative analysis of the anatomy of the epineurium of the canine recurrent laryngeal nerve.. Journal of anatomy. 2000. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19610085.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.