European radiology · 2015
Sonographic cross-sectional area measurement in carpal tunnel syndrome patients: can delta and ratio calculations predict severity compared to nerve conduction studies?
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Klauser Andrea S, Abd Ellah Mohamed M H, Halpern Ethan J, Siedentopf Christian, Auer Thomas, Eberle Gernot, Bellmann-Weiler Rosa, Kremser Christian, Sojer Martin, Löscher Wolfgang N, Gabl Markus F, Feuchtner Gudrun M, Jaschke Werner R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of two different sonographic median nerve measurement calculations in predicting carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) severity in a study population with clinically and electrophysiologically confirmed CTS.
METHODS: 643 wrists of 427 patients (325 females and 102 males, age range: 17-90 years, mean ± SD: 57.9 ± 14.7) were included with CTS diagnosis based on clinical and nerve conduction studies (NCS). Cross-sectional area (CSA) measurement of the median nerve was performed at the carpal tunnel level (CSAc) and at the pronator quadratus muscle level (CSAp). Two parameters were calculated: delta (∆-CSA), which is the difference between proximal and distal measurements, and ratio (R-CSA), calculated by dividing distal over proximal measurements.
RESULTS: Patients were classified into mild, moderate and severe CTS based upon NCS. The mean ∆-CSA (4.2 ± 2.6, 6.95 ± 2.2 and 10.7 ± 4.9 mm(2)) and mean R-CSA (1.5 ± 0.4, 1.95 ± 0.4 and 2.4 ± 0.7) values were significantly different between all groups (p < 0.001). Optimal cut-off values for ∆-CSA and R-CSA were 6 mm(2) and 1.7, respectively, to distinguish mild from moderate disease, and 9 mm(2) and 2.2, respectively, to distinguish moderate from severe disease.
CONCLUSION: Threshold values for the calculated sonographic parameters ∆-CSA and R-CSA are useful in predicting CTS severity compared to NCS.
KEY POINTS: • Two proposed parameters were calculated (∆-CSA, R-CSA) and compared to NCS. • A defined sonoanatomical proximal landmark was used for the calculation. • Both parameters showed ability to detect CTS severity comparable to NCS. • Cut-off values could be determined for both parameters.
METHODS: 643 wrists of 427 patients (325 females and 102 males, age range: 17-90 years, mean ± SD: 57.9 ± 14.7) were included with CTS diagnosis based on clinical and nerve conduction studies (NCS). Cross-sectional area (CSA) measurement of the median nerve was performed at the carpal tunnel level (CSAc) and at the pronator quadratus muscle level (CSAp). Two parameters were calculated: delta (∆-CSA), which is the difference between proximal and distal measurements, and ratio (R-CSA), calculated by dividing distal over proximal measurements.
RESULTS: Patients were classified into mild, moderate and severe CTS based upon NCS. The mean ∆-CSA (4.2 ± 2.6, 6.95 ± 2.2 and 10.7 ± 4.9 mm(2)) and mean R-CSA (1.5 ± 0.4, 1.95 ± 0.4 and 2.4 ± 0.7) values were significantly different between all groups (p < 0.001). Optimal cut-off values for ∆-CSA and R-CSA were 6 mm(2) and 1.7, respectively, to distinguish mild from moderate disease, and 9 mm(2) and 2.2, respectively, to distinguish moderate from severe disease.
CONCLUSION: Threshold values for the calculated sonographic parameters ∆-CSA and R-CSA are useful in predicting CTS severity compared to NCS.
KEY POINTS: • Two proposed parameters were calculated (∆-CSA, R-CSA) and compared to NCS. • A defined sonoanatomical proximal landmark was used for the calculation. • Both parameters showed ability to detect CTS severity comparable to NCS. • Cut-off values could be determined for both parameters.