Sonographic cross-sectional area measurement in carpal tunnel syndrome patients: can delta and ratio calculations predict severity compared to nerve conduction studies?
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the accuracy of two different sonographic median nerve measurement calculations in predicting carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) severity in a study population with clinically and electrophysiologically confirmed CTS.
METHODS
643 wrists of 427 patients (325 females and 102 males, age range: 17-90 years, mean ± SD: 57.9 ± 14.7) were included with CTS diagnosis based on clinical and nerve conduction studies (NCS). Cross-sectional area (CSA) measurement of the median nerve was performed at the carpal tunnel level (CSAc) and at the pronator quadratus muscle level (CSAp). Two parameters were calculated: delta (∆-CSA), which is the difference between proximal and distal measurements, and ratio (R-CSA), calculated by dividing distal over proximal measurements.
RESULTS
Patients were classified into mild, moderate and severe CTS based upon NCS. The mean ∆-CSA (4.2 ± 2.6, 6.95 ± 2.2 and 10.7 ± 4.9 mm(2)) and mean R-CSA (1.5 ± 0.4, 1.95 ± 0.4 and 2.4 ± 0.7) values were significantly different between all groups (p < 0.001). Optimal cut-off values for ∆-CSA and R-CSA were 6 mm(2) and 1.7, respectively, to distinguish mild from moderate disease, and 9 mm(2) and 2.2, respectively, to distinguish moderate from severe disease.
CONCLUSION
Threshold values for the calculated sonographic parameters ∆-CSA and R-CSA are useful in predicting CTS severity compared to NCS.
KEY POINTS: • Two proposed parameters were calculated (∆-CSA, R-CSA) and compared to NCS. • A defined sonoanatomical proximal landmark was used for the calculation. • Both parameters showed ability to detect CTS severity comparable to NCS. • Cut-off values could be determined for both parameters.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.