European journal of pain (London, England) · 2014
Topical high-concentration menthol: reproducibility of a human surrogate pain model.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mahn F, Hüllemann P, Wasner G, Baron R, Binder A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Human experimental pain models play an important role in studying neuropathic pain mechanisms. The objective of the present study was to test the reproducibility of the topical menthol model over a 1-week period.
METHOD: We performed an open, two-period study in 10 healthy volunteers with 40 menthol applications. The side of menthol application was randomly assigned. Two trial periods were separated by 1 week. Before and after applying menthol, selected quantitative sensory testing (QST) was performed. The area of mechanical pin-prick hyperalgesia was quantified. Spontaneous pain was recorded.
RESULTS: Application of menthol induced a statistically significant decrease in the cold pain threshold (CPT) (p < 0.001) and mechanical pain threshold and an increase in the mechanical pain sensitivity (MPS) (p < 0.001), indicating cold and mechanical (pin-prick) hyperalgesia. Test-retest reliability was best for CPT (r = 0.959) and MPS (r = 0.930). Intraclass correlation values showed excellent reliability for cold pain and MPS (ICC = 0.96, 0.89). The QST values post-menthol showed high inter-period correlation factors and no significant inter-period differences (paired t-test, t = 1.767-1.361; p = 0.111-0.988). The area size of mechanical hyperalgesia was not reliably reproducible.
CONCLUSION: For an observation period of 1 week, the signs of cold and mechanical hyperalgesia were reproducible with a highly significant correlation of about r = 0.8 and good agreement except for the area size of mechanical pin-prick hyperalgesia. These results demonstrate that the topical menthol pain model is suitable for pharmacological interventions repeated within an observation period of 1 week.
METHOD: We performed an open, two-period study in 10 healthy volunteers with 40 menthol applications. The side of menthol application was randomly assigned. Two trial periods were separated by 1 week. Before and after applying menthol, selected quantitative sensory testing (QST) was performed. The area of mechanical pin-prick hyperalgesia was quantified. Spontaneous pain was recorded.
RESULTS: Application of menthol induced a statistically significant decrease in the cold pain threshold (CPT) (p < 0.001) and mechanical pain threshold and an increase in the mechanical pain sensitivity (MPS) (p < 0.001), indicating cold and mechanical (pin-prick) hyperalgesia. Test-retest reliability was best for CPT (r = 0.959) and MPS (r = 0.930). Intraclass correlation values showed excellent reliability for cold pain and MPS (ICC = 0.96, 0.89). The QST values post-menthol showed high inter-period correlation factors and no significant inter-period differences (paired t-test, t = 1.767-1.361; p = 0.111-0.988). The area size of mechanical hyperalgesia was not reliably reproducible.
CONCLUSION: For an observation period of 1 week, the signs of cold and mechanical hyperalgesia were reproducible with a highly significant correlation of about r = 0.8 and good agreement except for the area size of mechanical pin-prick hyperalgesia. These results demonstrate that the topical menthol pain model is suitable for pharmacological interventions repeated within an observation period of 1 week.