MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2008.10.009

Медицинская библиотека · Seminars in pediatric surgery · 2009

The surgical approach to esophageal atresia repair and the management of long-gap atresia: results of a survey.

Ron Ori, De Coppi Paolo, Pierro Agostino

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The optimal approach for esophageal atresia (OA) repair and technique used for long-gap OA repair are controversial. There are few data comparing the outcomes of the different approaches and techniques. We performed a survey of current practice of 88 pediatric surgeons and asked experts to provide us with definitions and rationales behind their management strategies. There were no differences between UK and non-UK surgeons. Although the majority of pediatric surgeons perform minimally invasive surgery (68%), only 16% have performed thoracoscopic OA repair; however, 46% are planning to carry out thoracoscopic OA repair. Gastric interposition is the most preferred technique for long-gap OA when primary anastomosis is not possible, with 94% of those surgeons who use the technique satisfied with it. Growth of the esophageal ends by traction is the other major technique used, but only 76% of surgeons who use it are satisfied with it. Most surgeons repair < or =2 patients with long-gap OAs per year. Long-gap OA should be managed by a limited number of surgeons at each center. Even among experts, there is little consensus on the definition of or the optimum technique for repair of long-gap OA.

Для цитирования: Ron Ori, De Coppi Paolo, Pierro Agostino. The surgical approach to esophageal atresia repair and the management of long-gap atresia: results of a survey.. Seminars in pediatric surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2008.10.009.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.