Seminars in hearing · 2016
Can You Hear Me Now? Marketing Essentials for Audiologists in a Noisy Health Care World.
ОбзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
da Cruz Jose Arnaldo Shiomi, de Mattos Bruno, Srougi Miguel, Nguyen Hiep, Bonan Rafael, Denes Francisco, Giron Amilcar, Passerotti Carlo
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Bladder exstrophy (BE) is a rare condition that requires complex surgical corrections to achieve the goals of bladder functionality, normal sexual function, continence, and finally cosmesis. The purpose of this study was to identify clinical parameters that predict better quality of life (QOL) scores using a validated questionnaire (SF-36) with young adults after completing surgical reconstruction.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-three young adults (mean age 22.35 years, 29 men and 14 women) treated for BE were evaluated using the Short Form 36 general health questionnaire (SF-36). Clinical assessment involved evaluation of the actual condition regarding continence, sexual function, genital satisfaction and overall cosmesis.
RESULTS: Both genders presented similar QOL scores (p = 0.36). The QOL was not age-related (p = 0.63). Neither genders did not present any differences in the number of procedures (p = 0.27). Although no significant gender difference was found, clinical impairments - such as urinary fistula, incontinence, penile length and infertility - were associated with worse QOL scores and were male-related (p <0.01). The most common complaint after complete surgical repair was about penile length (26/29 patients, 89.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: Age and gender were not predictors of better QOL scores. Any clinical impairment, such as urinary leakage due to incontinence or fistula, penile length and infertility, tended to significantly decrease the overall QOL in male patients with BE. The male genitalia seems to be the most troublesome aspect post-adolescence in treated male patients with exstrophy-epispadias. It has an important impact on the overall QOL, mainly having a social affect on those patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-three young adults (mean age 22.35 years, 29 men and 14 women) treated for BE were evaluated using the Short Form 36 general health questionnaire (SF-36). Clinical assessment involved evaluation of the actual condition regarding continence, sexual function, genital satisfaction and overall cosmesis.
RESULTS: Both genders presented similar QOL scores (p = 0.36). The QOL was not age-related (p = 0.63). Neither genders did not present any differences in the number of procedures (p = 0.27). Although no significant gender difference was found, clinical impairments - such as urinary fistula, incontinence, penile length and infertility - were associated with worse QOL scores and were male-related (p <0.01). The most common complaint after complete surgical repair was about penile length (26/29 patients, 89.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: Age and gender were not predictors of better QOL scores. Any clinical impairment, such as urinary leakage due to incontinence or fistula, penile length and infertility, tended to significantly decrease the overall QOL in male patients with BE. The male genitalia seems to be the most troublesome aspect post-adolescence in treated male patients with exstrophy-epispadias. It has an important impact on the overall QOL, mainly having a social affect on those patients.