The Journal of reproductive medicine · 1997
Cost of assisted reproductive technologies for a health maintenance organization.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hidlebaugh D A, Thompson I E, Berger M J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To calculate the cost of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) for a health maintenance organization (HMO), assess factors that contribute to the cost per delivery and to analyze how utilization rates can be controlled by the use of clinical criteria.
STUDY DESIGN: Pregnancy outcome and a cost analysis of all ART cycles at an HMO in a state with mandated coverage for these procedures was performed. All patients (n = 148) undergoing ART cycles insured by the HMO performed at one in vitro fertilization (IVF) center during 1990-1995 were studied.
RESULTS: ART cycle outcomes and a cost analysis, including global cycle and cancellation charges, medication costs, obstetric costs and neonatal care costs, were assessed. ART cycles (n = 375) included IVF (n = 278), gamete intrafallopian transfer (n = 46), cryopreserved embryo transfer (ET) (n = 42), zygote intrafallopian transfer/tubal embryo transfer (n = 7) and donor oocyte (n = 2). Pregnancy outcome with IVF was 18.3% deliveries per retrieval, for gamete intrafallopian transfer 27.8% deliveries per retrieval and for frozen ET 19% per procedure. Overall, 62/148 (41.9%) of the patients delivered. There were 35 singletons, 22 twin sets and 5 triplet sets. This resulted in an average cycle cost per delivery of $36,417. The mean obstetric and neonatal charges were $9,329 for a singleton delivery, $20,318 for twins and $153,335 for triplets. If these charges are expressed in terms of the number of infants born, a twin pregnancy would cost $10,159 per infant and a triplet pregnancy, $51,112. The ART cycle cost per HMO plan member was $2.49 per annum. Our IVF utilization was 295 cycles per million population.
CONCLUSION: An HMO can control the cost of ART services by establishing preauthorization clinical criteria. Our utilization rates might be used as a benchmark for other insurers considering ART coverage. The cost of ART ($2.49 per annum) would be only a small fraction of the typical annual insurance premium.
STUDY DESIGN: Pregnancy outcome and a cost analysis of all ART cycles at an HMO in a state with mandated coverage for these procedures was performed. All patients (n = 148) undergoing ART cycles insured by the HMO performed at one in vitro fertilization (IVF) center during 1990-1995 were studied.
RESULTS: ART cycle outcomes and a cost analysis, including global cycle and cancellation charges, medication costs, obstetric costs and neonatal care costs, were assessed. ART cycles (n = 375) included IVF (n = 278), gamete intrafallopian transfer (n = 46), cryopreserved embryo transfer (ET) (n = 42), zygote intrafallopian transfer/tubal embryo transfer (n = 7) and donor oocyte (n = 2). Pregnancy outcome with IVF was 18.3% deliveries per retrieval, for gamete intrafallopian transfer 27.8% deliveries per retrieval and for frozen ET 19% per procedure. Overall, 62/148 (41.9%) of the patients delivered. There were 35 singletons, 22 twin sets and 5 triplet sets. This resulted in an average cycle cost per delivery of $36,417. The mean obstetric and neonatal charges were $9,329 for a singleton delivery, $20,318 for twins and $153,335 for triplets. If these charges are expressed in terms of the number of infants born, a twin pregnancy would cost $10,159 per infant and a triplet pregnancy, $51,112. The ART cycle cost per HMO plan member was $2.49 per annum. Our IVF utilization was 295 cycles per million population.
CONCLUSION: An HMO can control the cost of ART services by establishing preauthorization clinical criteria. Our utilization rates might be used as a benchmark for other insurers considering ART coverage. The cost of ART ($2.49 per annum) would be only a small fraction of the typical annual insurance premium.