MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jcf.2015.07.005

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2015

An evaluation of different steam disinfection protocols for cystic fibrosis nebulizers.

Hohenwarter K, Prammer W, Aichinger W, Reychler G

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Contamination is a key element in cystic fibrosis. For this reason, nebulizer hygiene is an important, but complex and time-consuming task for cystic fibrosis patients. The aim of this study was to compare different steam disinfection and drying protocols.

METHODS

One hundred nebulizer parts were inoculated with cystic fibrosis-related bacteria in high concentrations (Burkholderia multivorans 3.9 × 10(10)/ml, Staphylococcus aureus 8.9 × 10(8/)ml and Pseudomonas aeruginosa 2.1 × 10(9)/ml). Tubes with Mycobacterium abscessus complex were additionally tested. Six steam disinfectors were compared. Different methods of drying were examined.

RESULTS

All tested bacteria were efficiently killed by the different steam disinfectors tested. The risk of contamination depended on the method of drying.

CONCLUSIONS

Steam disinfection is a safe disinfection method. It is better to leave the nebulizers wet after steam disinfection than to manipulate them by active drying, which seems to be a source of recontamination.

Для цитирования: Hohenwarter K, Prammer W, Aichinger W, Reychler G. An evaluation of different steam disinfection protocols for cystic fibrosis nebulizers.. Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2015.07.005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.