Fertility and sterility · 2006
Embryonic karyotype in recurrent miscarriage with parental karyotypic aberrations.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carp Howard, Guetta Esther, Dorf Haya, Soriano David, Barkai Gad, Schiff Eyal
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assesses chromosomal aberrations in the abortus in recurrent miscarriage, in the presence of parental chromosomal aberrations.
DESIGN: Retrospective comparative cohort study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral unit in university hospital.
PATIENT(S): One thousand one hundred eight patients with 3-16 miscarriages before 20 weeks gestation; 113 patients with and 995 without chromosomal aberrations.
INTERVENTION(S): Karyotyping by standard G-banding techniques of both parents, and of 205 abortuses collected at curettage.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The incidence of the euploidic and aneuploidic abortuses according to the parental karyotype.
RESULT(S): Two hundred three abortuses were successfully karyotyped. In 164 embryos of patients with no parental chromosomal aberrations, 23.2% (38/164) had chromosome aberrations. Of the 39 abortuses karyotyped in patients with chromosomal aberrations, 17 had normal karyotypes, 8 had balanced translocations, 2 had inversions identical to the parents, and 12 (30.8%) had abnormal karyotypes. This difference is not statistically significant (odd ratio 1.47, 95% confidence interval 0.63-3.39). Only 4 of the 39 karyotyped abortuses had an unbalanced translocation.
CONCLUSION(S): Parental karyotyping was not particularly predictive of a subsequent miscarriage as a result of chromosomal aberrations as 43.5% of abortuses were euploidic, and the parental aberration was only passed on to the abortus in 10% of cases.
DESIGN: Retrospective comparative cohort study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral unit in university hospital.
PATIENT(S): One thousand one hundred eight patients with 3-16 miscarriages before 20 weeks gestation; 113 patients with and 995 without chromosomal aberrations.
INTERVENTION(S): Karyotyping by standard G-banding techniques of both parents, and of 205 abortuses collected at curettage.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The incidence of the euploidic and aneuploidic abortuses according to the parental karyotype.
RESULT(S): Two hundred three abortuses were successfully karyotyped. In 164 embryos of patients with no parental chromosomal aberrations, 23.2% (38/164) had chromosome aberrations. Of the 39 abortuses karyotyped in patients with chromosomal aberrations, 17 had normal karyotypes, 8 had balanced translocations, 2 had inversions identical to the parents, and 12 (30.8%) had abnormal karyotypes. This difference is not statistically significant (odd ratio 1.47, 95% confidence interval 0.63-3.39). Only 4 of the 39 karyotyped abortuses had an unbalanced translocation.
CONCLUSION(S): Parental karyotyping was not particularly predictive of a subsequent miscarriage as a result of chromosomal aberrations as 43.5% of abortuses were euploidic, and the parental aberration was only passed on to the abortus in 10% of cases.