DOI 10.1007/s00414-025-03669-x
Automatic rib fracture detection on postmortem CT data using deep learning.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To assess the performance of automatic rib fracture detection of an existing deep learning (DL) model, nnDetection, on a postmortem (PM) CT scan dataset, and to identify the main factors of domain shift between clinical and PM CT imaging.
BACKGROUND
Rib fracture detection and classification in forensic investigations is a time-consuming yet crucial task that can contribute to determine the cause of death. DL models are a promising tool, as recent research shows that radiologists using DL models can detect rib fractures in clinical CT scans at higher sensitivity and in shorter time.
METHODS
A dataset of 50 PMCT scans (24% women; age: mean 61, range 19 - 96 years) was retrospectively collected and annotated, and used to train a first instance of the model, nnDetPM. Another instance of the model, nnDetClin, was trained on data from another dataset, RibFrac, consisting of 660 clinical CT scans (36% women; age: mean 55, range 21 - 94 years).
RESULTS
On the PM testing set, nnDetPM achieved an average sensitivity of 70.2% and an average precision (at 0.1 intersection over union) of 78.1%, whereas nnDetClin fell far behind at 19.8% average sensitivity and 25.5% average precision, indicating a substantial impact of the domain shift from clinical to PM CT data. Further inspection of the results showed that the main factors of this domain shift were the position of the arms and the presence of medical ware in the image acquisition area of the PMCT scans.
CONCLUSION
The performance of nnDetPM, with an average sensitivity of 70.2%, was notable and comparable to that of radiologists. However, more advanced techniques must be explored to decide if DL models can overcome the domain shift factors.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.