MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2147/cia.s210062

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical interventions in aging · 2019

Different durations of cognitive stimulation therapy for Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chen Juexuan, Duan Yuting, Li Huanjie, Lu Liming, Liu Jihong, Tang Chunzhi

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy of cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) of different durations for Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHODS

A comprehensive search was carried out in three databases. The primary outcome was Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score. We conducted a meta-analysis with Review Manager, version 5.3 and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies using the Cochrane Collaboration Recommendations assessment tool.

RESULTS

Treatment effects from the meta-analysis showed that CST plus acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) was better than the control assessed by MMSE. In addition, the meta-analysis indicated that long-term CST was better than short-term or maintenance CST.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed that the combination of CST and drug treatment for AD is effective in AD, regardless of whether short-term CST, maintenance CST, or long-term CST is used. The long-term CST appears to be more effective.

Для цитирования: Chen Juexuan, Duan Yuting, Li Huanjie, Lu Liming, Liu Jihong, Tang Chunzhi. Different durations of cognitive stimulation therapy for Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Clinical interventions in aging. 2019. DOI: 10.2147/cia.s210062.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.