MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.94.33

Медицинская библиотека · Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology · 2003

[A case of urolithiasis associated with short bowel syndrome].

Kato Yuji, Tamaki Gaku, Tokumitsu Masayuki, Yamaguchi Satoshi, Yachiku Sunao, Okuyama Mitsuhiko

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We report a case of urolithiasis associated with short bowel syndrome. A 56-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital for asymptomatic bilateral renal stones. She had received extensive resection of small intestine due to strangulating obstructive ileus 7 years ago (residual intestine, only 20 cm). Subsequently, she was in a state of short bowel syndrome. Plain film of kidney, uteter, bladder and computed tomography revealed bilateral renal stones (right 4 mm, left 10 mm). The left renal stone was successfully treated by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Since the right renal stone was small, no treatment was performed. The stone fragments were composed of calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate, and excessive urinary excretion of oxalate (103.8 mg/day) was observed. In this patient, urolithiasis was diagnosed to be due to enteric hyperoxaluria caused by short bowel syndrome. To prevent the recurrence of stone formation, she was treated with oral administration of calcium lactate, sodium/potassium citrate and magnesium oxide. We review the Japanese literatures on urolithiasis with short bowel syndrome.

Для цитирования: Kato Yuji, Tamaki Gaku, Tokumitsu Masayuki, Yamaguchi Satoshi, Yachiku Sunao, Okuyama Mitsuhiko. [A case of urolithiasis associated with short bowel syndrome].. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology. 2003. DOI: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.94.33.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.