RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin · 1998
[Digital mammography: experiences in its clinical application].
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schönhofen H, Arnold W, Hess T, Allgayer B
Аннотация
TARGET: In 1989 in the Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne conventional film-screen mammography was replaced by digital mammography. With the support of a retrospective study, it was checked whether or not digital mammography represents an equally valid diagnostic procedure in daily routine.
METHODS: 1204 patients were examined using digital mammography. A reevaluation of these patients was carried out using clinical and radiological routine controls. Additionally a radiological and histological examination was performed in 127 cases in which excisional biopsies had been done, paying particular attention to detail perception.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of digital mammography achieved a total of 85%, whereas the accuracy was 81%. With additional use of ultrasound and galactography the sensitivity attained 91%. By reevaluation the sensitivity amounted to 87%, the accuracy remaining at 81%. The positive predictive value was especially high with 76% and 77%.
CONCLUSION: Digital mammography offers satisfactory diagnostic performance.
METHODS: 1204 patients were examined using digital mammography. A reevaluation of these patients was carried out using clinical and radiological routine controls. Additionally a radiological and histological examination was performed in 127 cases in which excisional biopsies had been done, paying particular attention to detail perception.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of digital mammography achieved a total of 85%, whereas the accuracy was 81%. With additional use of ultrasound and galactography the sensitivity attained 91%. By reevaluation the sensitivity amounted to 87%, the accuracy remaining at 81%. The positive predictive value was especially high with 76% and 77%.
CONCLUSION: Digital mammography offers satisfactory diagnostic performance.