MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13256-017-1497-7

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of medical case reports · 2017

Congenital basal meningoceles with different outcomes: a case series.

Okano Satomi, Tanaka Ryosuke, Okayama Akie, Tsuchida Etsushi, Nohara Fumikatsu, Suzuki Nao, Okamoto Toshio, Nagaya Ken, Takahashi Satoru, Azuma Hiroshi

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Basal meningoceles are rare congenital defects and often clinically occult until they result in life-threatening complications. Therefore, it is important to know the diagnostic clues to early diagnosis.

CASE PRESENTATION: We describe three cases of congenital basal meningocele in a 3-year-old Japanese boy, a 1-month-old Japanese baby boy, and a 10-month-old Japanese baby girl. One of our patients died of sepsis due to traumatic rupture of the meningocele during nasal suction. His meningocele remained undiagnosed until it resulted in the fatal complication. The other patients underwent surgical repair without any complications. Their meningoceles were complicated by midfacial anomalies including cleft palate and hypertelorism, or a sign of nasal obstruction such as snoring.

CONCLUSIONS

These clinical features may be a clue to the early diagnosis of congenital basal meningocele, which enables its safe preoperative management and provides an opportunity for surgical repair before the condition results in serious complications.

Для цитирования: Okano Satomi, Tanaka Ryosuke, Okayama Akie, Tsuchida Etsushi, Nohara Fumikatsu, Suzuki Nao, Okamoto Toshio, Nagaya Ken, Takahashi Satoru, Azuma Hiroshi. Congenital basal meningoceles with different outcomes: a case series.. Journal of medical case reports. 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s13256-017-1497-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.